Patagonia Is Threatening To Sue The Trump Administration
Grab them by the Antiquities Act of 1906.
Here we go again. Some untraditional, albeit important, industry news for the day starring everyone’s favourite sentient controversy. Last Wednesday, President Donald Trump penned an executive order that instructed a review of two dozen US national monuments. Which would either rescind or modify monuments larger than 100,000 acres.
“I’ve spoken with many state and local leaders, a number of them here today who care very much about preserving our land, and who are gravely concerned about this massive federal land grab,” Trump said in regards to the land previously put aside and protected as national monuments. “And now we’re going to free it up, which is what should have happened in the first place.”
Why should we be concerned, you ask? Well, this order would affect the California Coastal National Monument. Located along the entire California coastline, this monument ensures the protection of all islets, reefs and rock outcroppings within 12 nautical miles of the shore. Picturesque surf spots, diverse ecosystems and clean water that was once protected by law but now has the chance to be threatened by logging, oil drilling, commercial fishing and urban development.
With monuments like the California Coastal National Monument, alongside many others, now at risk, many individuals and groups are up in arms. Including hyper environmentally conscious brand Patagonia. After Trump signed his latest executive order, Patagonia CEO Rose Marcario went public with a statement condemning the president’s actions:
“A president does not have the authority to rescind a national monument,” she said. “An attempt to change the boundaries ignores the review process of cultural and historical characteristics and the public input. We’re watching the Trump administration’s actions very closely and preparing to take every step necessary, including legal action, to defend our most treasured public landscaped from coast to coast.”
While the president framed the order as a way to return power to states and individuals, after former President Barack Obama and those before him blocked development on hundreds of acres of federal land and water by creating and protecting various monuments, Marcario thinks his motives are much more sinister.
“We take this as a sign that Trump and his team prefer to cater to fossil fuel interests and state land grabs for unsuitable development,” she continued. “As stewards of America’s federal public lands, the Trump administration has an obligation to protect these most special wild places. Unfortunately, it seems clear they intend to do the opposite.”
Trump is citing the Antiquities Act of 1906 as justification for his actions. Originally established by US President Theodore Roosevelt, the Antiquities Act states that presidents have the authority to create national monuments on federal lands to protect significant natural, cultural, or scenic features. And while recent legal research suggests presidents can adjust lands previously established by their formers, they can’t outright abolish them.
Which is why many environmental groups and brands, such as Patagonia, believe Trump’s order can’t be justified, as it’s grounded in a gross misinterpretation of the act itself. Hence why they’re calling his decision unconstitutional altogether while also threatening further legal action.
Patagonia has vowed to fight the White House to preserve national monuments, like the California Coastal National Monument, tooth and nail. So if you’re a California surfer, and enjoy the occasional secluded surf outside the city, you can thank them for making sure those experiences (hopefully) stay bereft of construction noise and general urban pandemonium.
The WSL Pumps Over 10 Million USD Per Year Into CT Prize Money
Here’s how much surfers make, and how dramatically that’s changed over the years.
The Worst Day Of Competitive Surfing (So Far) In 2023
With 2-point heat wins and 30-minute lulls, Day 3 of the Billabong Pro Pipeline was…
Unlocked: ‘Toasted,’ By Caity Simmers
Your favorite surfer directs, edits, and stars in her first feature film.
More Dane Reynolds Than You Can Stomach In One Serving
Chapter 11 TV is everything surf media needs.
Kanoa Igarashi On Concussions, Goose Chases, Title Visions, The Three Types Of Surfers CT’ers Encounter In The Water, And More
A candid and wide-ranging conversation with 2022 World #5.
Can Small-Scale Investors Buy Into Wave Pools?
Say you got $10k and a dream — what can you do?
An Early Pipeline Exit For Stephanie Gilmore Amidst GenZ Glory
Day Two of the 2023 CT season was a clear notice that the kids are…
Hand-Shaping, Glassing, And Finishing ’70s-Inspired Displacement Hulls Will Not Make You Rich
Profile: Tristan Mausse of Fantastic Acid is in it for all the right reasons.
Hassling, Head-Dips, and Broken Apple Watches
The 2023 CT is underway. Here's what happened on Day One of the Billabong Pro…
Stephanie Gilmore And Filipe Toledo Are The 2022 Stab Surfers Of The Year
Caity and Hughie take Best Juniors, “NOZ VID” wins best film, and Ho and Pringle…
Red Bulls, Crypto Bears, Former’s Six-Figure Fish, Tyler’s Multi-Millions And More
A brief catalog of the latest surf industry news and whispers.
“Definitely The First Time I’ve Gone Surfing Via Plane”
Parker Coffin, Harrison Roach, and friends tear through NZ on Roark's most well-rounded surf trip…
Pipe Preview: This Year Feels Different
With John and Gabs healthy — and the arrival of the femme next-gen — here’s…
WSL Tells Competitors: ‘You Better Like Them Apples’
Will mandating competitors to wear Apple Watches make the 2023 tour more or less engaging?
Stab Surfer of the Year: John John Florence, Italo Ferreira, Balaram Stack, Rolo Montes, and Shaun Manners
Day 9: "You can't do better than his year last year." - John John Florence
Full Moon Surfs, Impassable Puddles, And A Few Nights Spent Sleeping In A WSL Commentary Booth
A reader-submitted collection of nonconformist surf stories.